You Might Like

Justificator

- Noun

One who justifies or vindicates; a justifier.


More related articles

  • Justification (Theology)

  • Insufficient justification

    Insufficient justification (insufficient punishment) is a phenomenon under the realm of social psychology. It synthesizes theories of cognitive dissonance and internal vs. external justification. Essentially, insufficient justification is when an individual utilizes internal motivation to justify a behavior. It is most commonly seen in insufficient punishment, which is the dissonance experienced when individuals lack sufficient external justification for having resisted a desired activity or object, usually resulting in individuals' devaluing the forbidden activity or object. That is, when an individual can't come up with an external reason as to why they resisted doing something they wanted to, he or she decides to derogate the activity. Mild punishment will cause a more lasting behavioral change than severe punishment because internal justification is stronger than external justification.

  • Effort justification

    Effort justification is an idea and paradigm in social psychology stemming from Leon Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance. Effort justification is a person's tendency to attribute a value to an outcome, which they had to put effort into achieving, greater than the objective value of the outcome.

  • Consequentialist justifications of the state

    Consequentialist justifications of the state are philosophical arguments which contend that the state is justified by the good results it produces.

  • Bibliography of justification (theology)

    This is a sub-page for the Justification (theology) page.

  • Justification from eternity

    Justification from eternity is a concept within Protestant theology asserting that the justification of a believer takes place at least partially in eternity past.

  • Bibliography of Justification (theology)

  • Elachista justificata

    Elachista justificata is a moth of the family Elachistidae that is found in South Africa.

  • Justification and excuse

    Justification and excuse are different defenses in a criminal case. Both defenses admit that the defendant committed an act proscribed by law. The proscribed act has justification if the act had positive effects that outweigh its negative effects, or is not wrong or blameworthy. The proscribed act is excused if the defendant's violation was not entirely voluntary, such as if they acted under duress or under a false belief. Martin v. Ohio (1986) established that states may make justification an affirmative defense, placing the burden of proof on defendant. Patterson v. New York (1977) established that states may make excuses, such as involving mental state, an affirmative defense, rather than part of the mens rea element the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Coherence theory of justification

You Might Like